
You've sourced a property that ticks every box — strong location, clear value-add potential, and a credible exit. You move quickly, agree terms, and approach a lender. Then the offer comes back: the loan-to-value in bridging finance is lower than you expected. Suddenly, you need to inject more capital, your projected return tightens, and the deal is on the brink of collapse.
So why does this single percentage carry so much weight?
In bridging finance, loan-to-value (LTV) is the number that underpins everything — risk, pricing, leverage, and ultimately whether your deal proceeds at all. This article will help you understand how LTV works in practice, how lenders interpret it, and how to position your deal to secure the best possible terms.
And it's worth setting expectations early: bridging finance is not a traditional mortgage. The rules are different, the timelines are shorter, and the tolerance for risk is assessed in a very different way.
At its core, loan-to-value in bridging finance is a simple calculation that expresses how much you are borrowing against the value of a property.
Loan amount ÷ property value × 100
For example: €480,000 ÷ €700,000 × 100 = 68.6% LTV
This looks straightforward, but the key variable is the "property value". From a lender's perspective, this is not necessarily the purchase price or your opinion of worth — it is the figure determined through their valuation process.
LTV is also closely linked to equity. If your LTV is 68.6%, your equity is 31.4%. They represent the same relationship from opposite perspectives: the lender focuses on LTV to measure exposure, while the borrower focuses on equity to understand their stake.
Bridging finance often advertises higher LTVs — typically up to 70–75% — compared with traditional mortgages from Irish banks and building societies. But these higher figures come with conditions.
One key distinction is gross LTV vs. net LTV.
Net LTV is the actual cash you receive against the property value. Gross LTV includes fees, interest, and other costs that are rolled into the loan.
This means your real exposure may be higher than it first appears.
Security also plays a role. First-charge loans sit in primary position against the property and generally allow higher LTVs. Second-charge loans are subordinate, so lenders reduce LTV to compensate for increased risk.
Then there's the time factor. Bridging loans are short-term, which compresses the risk window. Lenders must be confident not only in the asset, but in how quickly they can exit if things go wrong. Speed changes everything.
Understanding how lenders determine value is essential to understanding loan-to-value in bridging finance in an Irish context.
Most lenders will consider:
Open Market Value (OMV) — the price achievable under normal market conditions, as assessed by a Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland (SCSI) or RICS-qualified valuer
In many cases, the lower of the two will be used to calculate LTV.
For development projects — increasingly common in Ireland given the ongoing housing supply shortfall — Gross Development Value (GDV) is also relevant. This is the projected value of the property once works are complete. However, GDV is inherently uncertain, depending on execution, planning compliance, market conditions, and timing.
Valuation methods vary depending on risk: desktop valuations are quicker and used for lower-risk or lower-LTV cases, while full SCSI/RICS surveys involve a physical inspection and provide a more robust assessment.
Consider this example:
The resulting LTV is 68.6% against OMV, but 76.2% against the forced-sale value. Same deal, different valuation basis — and a significantly different risk profile.
LTV is not just about eligibility — it directly affects pricing, lender choice, and deal speed. In Ireland, the bridging market is smaller than the UK, which means lender appetite can be more concentrated at lower LTV bands.
Sub-50% LTV: The sweet spot. You'll access the widest pool of lenders, the most competitive rates, and the fastest decisions.
50–65% LTV: The core of the Irish bridging market. Competitive, widely available, and suitable for most straightforward deals.
65–70% LTV: Lender options narrow. Expect increased scrutiny, particularly around your exit strategy and property location — Dublin and other major urban centres are viewed more favourably.
70–75% LTV: Specialist territory. These deals require strong fundamentals, a clear exit, and often additional comfort for the lender. Outside prime urban areas, availability reduces significantly. Rates are indicative and subject to lender assessment, deal specifics, and prevailing market conditions in Ireland.
LTV is critical, but it is never assessed in isolation. In Ireland, lenders pay particular attention to several factors that reflect local market dynamics.
Exit strategy: This is the most important factor. Whether you plan to sell, refinance onto a standard Irish mortgage, or complete a development project, the lender must believe it is realistic and achievable within the loan term.
Property type and condition: Non-standard construction — which is more common in older Irish housing stock — increases risk and reduces acceptable LTV. Unmortgageable properties or those without full planning compliance are viewed with particular caution.
Location liquidity: Dublin, Cork, Galway, Limerick, and Waterford offer stronger liquidity than rural or remote locations. If the lender had to sell quickly in a less active market, that risk is priced into the LTV.
Borrower experience: A seasoned Irish developer or investor will often be trusted with higher leverage than a first-time borrower entering the market.
Loan term: Longer terms mean more rolled-up interest, which increases the effective LTV over time — particularly relevant in Ireland where bridging terms commonly range from 3 to 18 months.
The most experienced Irish property investors treat LTV as something to manage — not maximise.
Borrow less than the maximum: Leaving a buffer protects you against valuation changes, unexpected construction costs, or planning delays — all of which are genuine risks in the Irish market.
Stress-test your exit: If your property sells for 15% less than expected, or if it takes longer to refinance due to tightening mortgage lending criteria, does the deal still work?
Use additional security: Cross-charging another Irish asset can reduce your effective LTV and unlock better terms. This is a common strategy for experienced investors with an established portfolio.
Track LTV during development: As build costs rise and GDV evolves — particularly relevant given recent construction cost inflation in Ireland — your risk position shifts. Monitor it closely.
Plan for market changes: Ireland's property market has experienced significant volatility historically. If values soften mid-loan, refinancing may become harder. Build contingency into your strategy from day one.
LTV is the lender's primary measure of risk — and the biggest driver of your terms. The "value" used in LTV is the lender's figure, not yours. Higher LTV always comes with trade-offs in cost, flexibility, or scrutiny. Your exit strategy matters as much as the percentage itself. Managing LTV proactively is the difference between a resilient deal and a fragile one.
Before assuming what you can borrow, speak to a specialist Irish bridging broker. The difference between what's advertised and what's actually achievable — particularly outside Dublin — can be significant.
Contact Derry
Mobile: 086 0255898
Email: derry@smebusinessloans.ie
Contact David
Mobile: 086 4110943
Email: david@smebusinessloans.ie
